Korg’s Nano range

June 6, 2009

I’ve never been impressed by Korg’s MicroKontrol MIDI controller, with its horrible spongy keyboard and unyielding drum pads, so I was wary of Korg’s Nano controller range. Eventually, however, the weight of positive reviews for the Nano range of compact controllers swayed me, and so I jumped in and ordered a NanoKey, NanoKontrol and NanoPad (which, by the way, are now available in black, in addition to the original blue-and-white colour scheme).

None of these devices make a sound (unless you count the way in which the NanoKey produces quite a loud, yet somehow satisfying, click when you press the keys!) and are intended purely as controllers for use with your MIDI-enabled software. The devices can be plugged into a USB port on your computer (using the sensibly long USB leads supplied) and be used immediately, although Windows users are encouraged by Korg to download and install its drivers (to provide multi-application support for such devices, or some such thing that Microsoft omitted to include in its unmusical OS), and both Mac and Windows users can download software and configuration files that allow the default settings on the units to be tweaked for use with just about any piece of audio software (Linux users would have to supply their own software – just the way they like it). Korg is a big corporation and doesn’t waste its time telling you exactly where you should obtain the software: you are given a URL to a list of its distributors, and then it’s up to you to go to your country’s Korg site and look for it. That won’t be a major task for most computer-savvy musicians, but a single, direct download link would have been courteous.

The NanoKey is a miniature keyboard with two octaves of miniature touch-sensitive keys plus buttons to raise and lower the current octave, nano2.jpgbend the pitch and send modulation. It’s responsive and easy to play, although the keyboard will feel more familiar to typists than to concert pianists. Most users of computer software will be happy enough.

The NanoKontrol features nine faders, 9 knobs, 18 buttons plus transport controls. Korg supplies templates to help you use the device with its Legacy range of software synthesisers, in addition to Logic 8, FL Studio 8, Traktor and Cubase 4: these templates can be written to the NanoKontrol using the software editor available for free download. nano1.jpgAs a Mac user, I tried, as you might have expected, the Logic template, which sets the NanoKontrol up to control volume fader and pan positions. This in itself is rather limited but the NanoKontrol’s many buttons make it very suitable for use with the third-party LC XMU software, which will persuade Logic that it has a Mackie Control attached. I tried it, and found that this little fader box was then even more versatile (yes, of course it lacks motorised faders and other features, but it takes up a lot less desk space!).

The NanoPad has twelve pads for use by those who like to drum using their fingers. Flam and Roll buttons, when used with the track pad, can be used to provide the expected drumming effects and these make the results of triggering drum samples sound just a little more like the real thing. When neither Roll nor Flam are being used, the track pad outputs controller messages when you use it, providing another way to interact with software plug-ins, provided your music software allows you to tell it how to respond to such control messages. Using Logic’s “Learn” function, I quickly assigned the X axis to the cut-off frequency of a low-pass filter on a software synthesiser, and the Y axis to the filter’s resonance. Fun ensued. The track pad won’t compete with more upmarket offerings, but this functionality was an unexpected bonus, and one more reason not to buy a Kaoss Pad.

Korg Nano case.jpgThe three units (one of each type is the only allowed permutation: don’t expect to be able to store three Nano Kontrols this way without risking damage to them) can be stored and carried in an optional fold-up case made by Korg, which is sold together with a neat USB hub which has four ports and a short, integral lead. There is also a pouch in the case which I found could accommodate the three USB cables – but there then seems to be no room to stash away the USB hub too without risking damage to the controllers (the hub would be pressing against the Nano Kontrol’s plastic controls, which I would not expect to be especially robust). You can fit the USB hub in the case if you remove one of the USB cables. What’s the sense in that? If you are going to have great ideas, such as these cases, and then ruin things by lack of attention to detail, you might as well print “Apple” on the case, not “Korg”.

The Nano series is affordable, if not dirt cheap, reflecting perhaps a sensible balancing on Korg’s part of build quality against manufacturing costs. The controllers are pleasing to use and invite experimenting. Laptop owners will find them to be valued travelling companions (provided they don’t forget the USB hub which they will have to pack separately, remember – how stupid), but the units are fun enough to play with on a personal computer of any size.


Bloggers in Biofeedback Baloney Backlash

May 20, 2009

electrode-synth2.jpg

The synthesiser world was sent reeling yesterday (and the day before that, and the day before, and indeed last week) when dozens of music blogs published a photograph of a man wearing a hat.

But this was no ordinary hat: it had electrodes, and its wearer claimed that he would use it to control his synthesiser.

But this was no ordinary synthesiser: it was an old synthesiser, with patch cables.

“Look,” explained the Artist, “at me”.

But last night the synth community reeled in shock from suggestions that they had been the victims of an elaborate hoax.

One heartbroken blogger, who wished not to remain anonymous, was driven to tears.

“The intensely self-satisfied yet faintly ironic look on his face convinced me that this was a serious sound artist who had taken to wearing electrode hats. If this photo is part of a hoax, it is a very cruel and irresponsible one”.


Twitter Tragedy – Who is to Blame?

April 17, 2009

pothole2.jpgHope is fading for the Twitter users who disappeared recently in perilous circumstances.

The twittering pot-holers – or “twotholers”, as they are known – were believed to be trying to find the fabled north-west approach to Stephen Fry’s Passage when conditions took a turn for the worst.

A spokesman for the rescue patrol said that there was still a slight crack of hope, and that there could yet be light at the end of the tunnel.

“Millions of twitterers a year try this difficult sport without incident”, he explained. “Usually the attempts are unsuccessful but safe, but in this case it is unfortunate that a particularly tight crawl was attempted”.


Responsible politics

April 17, 2009

The UK’s Prime Minister, Gordon Brown:-

“I take full responsibility for what happened. That’s why the person who was responsible went immediately.”

(Source: everywhere).

So he takes responsibility, but he wasn’t responsible.

Do you see?

If you did see, straight away, you have a career in politics ahead of you. Otherwise, you pass.


Money isn’t everything

April 13, 2009

From the header of a weblog about marketing on the Web:

ouch.jpg

Ouch.

Other than that, apparently you have to use Twitter. For er, viral er interactive um… yeah.


Radio session by Cousin Silas

April 5, 2009

Cousin Silas has recorded a set of brooding, mysterious music for internet radio Show Phantom Circuit.

You can listen to it on demand.


Business as usual

April 2, 2009

The BBC reports one Dr Nina Federoff, “science and technology advisor to the US secretary of state since 2007″ (another example of the Obama presidency keeping advisors from the previous administration) as saying that “There are probably already too many people on the planet”.

There’s no “probably” about it. However, Federoff carved out a career in biotechnology and is not so delicate about advocating the dream that GM crops will save the day, going so far as to say that opposition to widespread growing of genetically modified crops indicates that “we want to go back to the 19th Century”.

Funnily enough, Federoff would have as all believe that, by submitting the world to GM experiments, we would be going back to prehistory. Her article ‘Prehistoric GM Corn’ in Science magazine (14th Nov. 2003) followed the traditional GM industry ploy of presenting the technology as spectacularly new whilst somehow also being nothing new at all – whilst confounding terms to serve the mission.


Cutbacks

March 30, 2009

cutbacks-2.jpg

Photograph taken in Bourton-on-the-Water, the Cotswolds.


Mac OS X 10.5 shortcuts

March 29, 2009
Command-O

Display a spinning beachball

Command-Tab

Display a spinning beachball

Command-Q

Display a spinning beachball

Look at the screen

Display a spinning beachball

No, I don’t have a light

March 28, 2009

No, sorry, I don’t have a light. I don’t smoke. You scowl and turn away, outraged. But have you considered buying your own “lights”, rather than scowling at those inconsiderate non-smokers who do not carry around such paraphernalia for you?

Nor do I carry clean needles, rolled up banknotes, hookahs or portable chemistry sets from Switzerland. That’s very remiss of me, and I should be here to satisfy the cravings and addictions of anyone who accosts me in the street needing a fix.

Speaking of which, do you have a spoon for my coffee? Stir it for me, would you?

No sugar, thanks.